WHO WON? IT DEPENDS ON HOW YOU TALLY THE VOTES
In Section 13.1, you learned about five different methods for tallying votes from a preference table and explored how the different methods sometimes lead to different outcomes. Now it's time to start thinking about who might prefer which method in which situation.
As a recap, here are the methods to tally votes from a preference table.
-
The majority rule decision means that the winner is supported by a majority of the voters; that is, more than of the voters rank a single candidate in first place.
-
The plurality method states that the candidate with the most first-place votes wins—majority or not.
-
The Borda count method assigns each ranking a specific number of points based on how many candidates are in the election.
-
The plurality with elimination method requires the winner to have a majority of the votes and uses a series of eliminations, if necessary, to choose the winner.
-
The pairwise comparison method pairs each candidate with every other candidate in a head-to-head vote count.
Let's compare two of the methods by analyzing the pros and cons of each. Here are some reflection questions to guide your responses.
-
In what situation might a person prefer this method?
-
Who stands to benefit from this method?
-
Who is least likely to benefit from this method?
-
What is a real-world example where this method is used? (This may require some internet research.)
-
Select any two of the methods for tallying votes from a preference table.
Method 1:
Method 2:
-
Describe an advantage of your chosen Method 1.
-
Describe a downside of your chosen Method 1.
-
Describe an advantage of your chosen Method 2.
-
Describe a downside of your chosen Method 2.
-
Give an example where a person would prefer one of your chosen methods over the other. State clearly which method is preferred from that person's perspective and why.